Gov. Hochul Selects Georgia Firm to Manage NY Home Health Care Program Despite Opposition

Gov. Kathy Hochul’s Overhaul of New York’s Home Health Care Program: A Controversial Shift

In a bold move that has sparked significant debate, New York Governor Kathy Hochul is advancing a plan to overhaul the administration of the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program (CDPAP), a vital service for approximately 250,000 New Yorkers. This initiative, which allows elderly and disabled individuals to utilize public funds to hire aides—including family members—has drawn both support and criticism from various stakeholders, including lawmakers, home care companies, and patient advocates.

The New Management Structure

Hochul’s administration recently announced that Public Partnerships LLC, a Georgia-based firm, will take over the management of CDPAP by mid-2025. This program, which cost Medicaid over $9 billion last year, is currently administered by more than 600 companies across New York State that handle payroll, timesheets, and other administrative tasks. Under the new plan, Public Partnerships will subcontract with around 30 regional home care companies, aiming to streamline operations and enhance service delivery.

In her statement, Hochul emphasized the potential benefits of this transition, asserting that it would lead to a "stronger CDPAP" and a "diverse, statewide partnership" to ensure high-quality, personalized care for New Yorkers. However, the specific financial terms of the contract with Public Partnerships have yet to be disclosed.

Rationale Behind the Overhaul

The governor’s proposal is part of this year’s state budget and is framed as a necessary step to improve oversight, reduce the risk of fraud or abuse, and ultimately save taxpayer dollars. Hochul’s administration argues that consolidating management under a single entity will enhance accountability and streamline processes that have become cumbersome under the current system.

Opposition and Concerns

Despite the administration’s optimistic outlook, a coalition of home care companies and advocates, known as the Alliance to Protect Home Care, has vehemently opposed the plan. They argue that the overhaul could lead to a reduction in the number of patients served, jeopardizing the care of vulnerable populations. The coalition has raised concerns about Public Partnerships LLC, citing a pending class-action lawsuit in Pennsylvania that alleges the company failed to pay home care workers overtime.

Bryan O’Malley, executive director of the Alliance to Protect Home Care, criticized Hochul’s decision, stating, "Hochul is handing New York’s home care program over to a company that has been a complete disaster in every state they’ve operated." This sentiment reflects a broader apprehension among stakeholders about the potential implications of the transition.

The Administration’s Defense

In response to the backlash, Hochul’s spokesperson, Sam Spokony, pointed out that many existing home care firms in New York have faced legal challenges related to worker treatment. He argued that consolidating management under Public Partnerships would create a more accountable system. Maria Perrin, chief growth officer for Public Partnerships, denied allegations of wage theft and emphasized that the company continues to operate successfully in several states, including New Jersey, Tennessee, and Virginia.

Perrin also highlighted the company’s commitment to collaborating with diverse home care providers across New York, aiming to ensure that the needs of various populations are met during the transition.

Legislative Pushback

The proposed changes have prompted legislative responses as well. State Senator Gustavo Rivera, a Bronx Democrat, has introduced a bill to halt Hochul’s plan, advocating instead for a licensing scheme to enhance oversight of the numerous companies that currently serve as intermediaries in the CDPAP. Additionally, a group of 30 state senators has expressed concerns to the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, fearing that the overhaul could limit consumer choice in selecting home care providers.

Rivera has voiced skepticism about the feasibility of the proposed changes, stating, "You are insisting that this is something that you’re going to be able to do in an elegant fashion. I don’t believe it." His concerns are echoed by many who fear that the transition could disrupt the care that many New Yorkers rely on.

Support for the Initiative

Conversely, some lawmakers have expressed optimism regarding Hochul’s initiative. State Assemblyman George Alvarez, a Bronx Democrat, welcomed the announcement, viewing it as a positive step toward protecting home care services in New York. The union 1199 SEIU is reportedly seeking to organize more home care workers amid the transition, indicating a potential shift in the labor landscape as the program evolves.

Conclusion

As Governor Hochul moves forward with her plan to overhaul the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program, the debate surrounding the initiative continues to intensify. With significant financial implications and the potential to affect the lives of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers, the outcome of this transition will be closely monitored by all stakeholders involved. The coming months will be critical in determining whether the proposed changes will achieve their intended goals or if they will face further opposition and challenges.

Latest Updates

Related Articles

Alex Hernandez

Typically replies within a day